google.com, pub-4780026842119844, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
top of page
Writer's pictureDr Sp Mishra

Freedom and Equality Vs Competition and Survival (ICC Blog # 50)

Updated: Oct 3


A creative expression
AI Generated

Introduction

The Earth is now home to over 8 billion people, and by the end of the century, this number is projected to approach 10 billion. Among the many factors crucial for our future, the ability to compete, survive, and thrive is paramount. This is not a new phenomenon; we have genetically evolved to do this throughout our evolutionary history.


Throughout history, the ideals of freedom and equality have often been more aspirational than actualized. From the earliest hunter-gatherer societies to the modern information age, human beings have consistently organized themselves into hierarchical structures. This blog post explores the evolution of these social structures, drawing on insights from “The Lessons of History” by Will and Ariel Durant and “Sapiens” by Yuval Noah Harari.


Hunter-Gatherer Societies

In the earliest stages of human evolution, our ancestors lived as hunter-gatherers. These societies were characterized by small, nomadic groups that relied on hunting animals and gathering plants for sustenance. Food availability was unpredictable, leading to a feast-or-famine lifestyle. Cooperation was essential for survival, and tools were developed to improve hunting efficiency.

Leadership and Hierarchy: Even in these early societies, there were leaders—often the strongest, most intelligent, or most skilled individuals who could provide for the group. These leaders were not just providers but also protectors and decision-makers, establishing an early form of social hierarchy.


Agricultural Revolution

The transition to agriculture marked a significant shift in human history. With the domestication of plants and animals, humans began to settle in one place, leading to the formation of villages and communities. This period saw the development of surplus food production, which allowed for population growth and the establishment of more complex social structures.


Community and Family: The agricultural revolution fostered the development of extended families and communities. People worked together to cultivate crops, store food, and protect their resources. However, this also led to competition between different communities for resources and land.


Hierarchy and Power: As communities grew, so did the complexity of their social structures. Leaders emerged not only based on physical strength but also on their ability to manage resources, negotiate with other groups, and maintain social order. This period saw the rise of early forms of governance and social stratification.


Industrial Age

The Industrial Revolution brought about another profound transformation. People moved from rural areas to cities to work in factories, leading to the nuclearization of families. The focus shifted from agricultural production to industrial manufacturing, and large-scale factories became the centres of economic activity.


Workplace Dynamics: In factories, individuals worked in large groups but often competed with other groups for jobs, wages, and resources. This competition extended beyond the workplace, influencing social interactions and community structures.


Nuclear Families: The move to urban areas and factory work led to the separation of extended families. Nuclear families—consisting of parents and their children—became the norm. This shift had significant implications for social support systems and community cohesion.


Information Age

The advent of the information age has further transformed human societies. Advances in technology have enabled remote work and increased individualism. People can now work from anywhere, reducing the need for physical offices and traditional workplace structures.


Individualism and Remote Work: The information age has empowered individuals to work independently or in smaller, more flexible groups. This shift has led to greater autonomy but also increased isolation for some.


Persistent Hierarchies: Despite technological advancements and the push for democratic ideals, hierarchical structures remain prevalent. Leaders in modern societies are often those who excel in strategic thinking, innovation, and communication.


Utopian Ideals vs. Reality

The utopian ideals of freedom and equality have been explored in various philosophical and literary works. Thomas More’s “Utopia” and Plato’s “Republic” envision societies where equality and communal living are central. However, these ideals often clash with the inherent human tendencies towards hierarchy and competition.


The Lessons of History: Will and Ariel Durant, in “The Lessons of History,” argue that human nature has remained consistent throughout history. They suggest that while human behaviour has evolved, the fundamental instincts of competition and hierarchy persist. The Durants emphasize that ideas are powerful forces in history, capable of shaping societies and influencing future generations.


Sapiens: Yuval Noah Harari, in “Sapiens,” explores the major revolutions in human history—the Cognitive Revolution, the Agricultural Revolution, and the Scientific Revolution. Harari argues that these revolutions have empowered humans to create complex societies and shared myths, such as religion and capitalism, which have enabled large-scale cooperation. However, he also notes that these shared myths often reinforce hierarchical structures.


Modern Implications

In today’s world, democratic societies strive to uphold principles of freedom and equality. However, the underlying human instincts and social structures from our evolutionary past still influence our behaviours and societal organization. This duality reflects the ongoing tension between our aspirational ideals and our evolutionary heritage.


Exploring the history of human evolution unveils a complex narrative that sheds light on the intricate relationship between freedom, equality, and societal progress. While the ideals of freedom and equality are often considered paramount in modern societies, achieving them in their purest form remains an elusive goal. The concept of utopia, where these ideals are fully realized, poses a paradoxical challenge to the advancement of both the world and society. It is argued that in a state of utopia, where every individual enjoys absolute freedom and equality, the drive for progress and evolution may stagnate. This raises thought-provoking questions about the balance between individual liberties and collective advancement.


Furthermore, the notion of interplanetary habitation introduces a futuristic perspective to the discussion. As humanity sets its sights on exploring and colonizing other planets, the dynamics of freedom and equality take on new dimensions. The challenges of establishing viable societies beyond Earth's boundaries necessitate a reevaluation of traditional notions of governance, social structures, and individual rights. The pursuit of interplanetary habitation thus becomes not only a technological and logistical endeavour but also a philosophical and ethical one.


In this context, the quest for freedom and equality in modern societies is not merely a static objective but a dynamic process intertwined with the broader trajectory of human evolution. It invites us to reconsider the fundamental principles that underpin our social order and challenges us to envision a future where these ideals coexist harmoniously with the imperatives of progress and exploration.


Conclusion

Due to our inherent human nature, individuals, societies, or nations with greater wealth will persist in exerting influence over those with less. While the ideals of freedom and equality will serve as a universal framework, ensuring societal stability, the fundamental human instincts will inevitably propel the formation of hierarchical structures, characterized by a minority of leaders and a majority of followers. And our quest continues, Freedom and Equality vs competition and Survival.


Share your thoughts.

3 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page